Comparison of Ultrasound-Assisted and Classic Approaches to Continuous Paravertebral Block for Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery: a Prospective Randomized Trial

Authors

  • A. Uskova Department of Anesthesiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, USA
  • L. LaColla Department of Anesthesiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, USA
  • F. Albani Department of Anesthesiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, USA
  • AS Auroux Department of Anesthesiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, USA
  • JE Chelly Department of Anesthesiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, USA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14205/2310-9394.2015.03.01.2

Keywords:

Surgery-thoracic, Anesthetic techniques-regional-paravertebral.

Abstract

Background: Continuous paravertebral blocks (PVBs) are an established means of providing postoperative analgesia in thoracic surgery. While PVBs can be administered using multiple methods, no randomized clinical trial comparing the relative advantages of the ultrasound-assisted approach to the traditional landmark approach, the two most commonly-used approaches in our hospital, has been conducted to date. Our study thus sought to compare the efficacy of these two methods of PVB placement.

Methods: From July 1, 2013 to June 5, 2014, 45 patients scheduled for thoracic surgery consented to participate in the study. Each patient was randomized into a group receiving PVB placed with either the classic landmark-based (CL) or ultrasound-assisted (US) approach. Each group received 20 ml of ropivacaine 0.5% as the local anesthetic (LA). Onset time and spread of the block were then assessed by a blind observer. The main outcome was hydromorphone consumption 24 hours after initiation of patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). Secondary outcomes were the following: Pain Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) score after 24 hours at rest and during deep inspiration; requested PCA boluses in 24 hours; total LA consumption and number of boluses through the catheter; and changes between pre-and post-operative (24 hours after surgery) tidal volume, forced vital capacity, forced expiatory volume in 1 sec, and peak expiatory flow.

Results: Mean opiate consumption during the 24 hours after PCA initiation was 5.75 mg (4.23-7.26) for the CL group and 6.38 mg (4.51-8.25) for the US group (p= 0.643). None of the secondary outcomes statistically differed between the two groups.

Conclusions: Our data supports the concept that choice of continuous PVB approach does not affect the outcome. The expertise of the anesthesiologist performing the block remains a key factor in choosing which approach to use.

References

Bimston DN, McGee JP, Liptay MJ, and Fry WA. Continuous paravertebral extrapleural infusion for post-thoracotomy pain management. Surgery 1999; 126(4): 650-656. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0039-6060(99)70118-2

Davies RG, Myles PS, and Graham JM. A comparison of the analgesic efficacy and side-effects of paravertebral vs epidural blockade for thoracotomy-a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Br J Anaesth 2006; 96(4): 418-426. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bja/ael020

Pluijms WA, Steegers MA, Verhagen AF, Scheffer GJ and Wilder-Smith OH. Chronic post-thoracotomy pain: a retrospective study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2006; 50(7): 804-808. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-6576.2006.01065.x

Richardson J, Sabanathan S, Jones S, Shah RD, Cheema S, and Mearns AJ. A prospective, randomized comparison of preoperative and continuous balanced epidural or paravertebral bupivacaine on post-thoracotomy pain, pulmonary function and stress responses. Br J Anaesth 1999; 83(3): 387-92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bja/83.3.387

Català E, Casas JI, Unzueta MC, Diaz X, Aliaga K, and Villar Landeira JM. Continuous infusion is superior to bolus doses with thoracic paravertebral blocks after thoracotomies. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 1996; 10(5): 586-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1053-0770(96)80133-9

Hill SE, Keller RA, Stafford-Smith M, Grichnik K, White WD, D’Amico DA, and Newman MF. Efficacy of single-dose, multilevel paravertebral nerve blockade for analgesia after thoracoscopic procedures. Anesthesiology 2006; 104(5): 1047-53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00000542-200605000-00022

Andreae MH and Andreae DA. Regional Anesthesia to prevent chronic pain after surgery: a Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth 2013; 111(5): 711- 20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bja/aet213

Casati A, Alessandrini P, Nuzzi M, Tosi M, Iotti E, Ampollini L, Bobbio A, Rossini E, and Fanelli G. A prospective, randomized, blinded comparison between continuous thoracic paravertebral and epidural infusion of 0.2% ropivacaine after lung resection surgery. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2006; 23(12): 999-1004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0265021506001104

Davies RG, Myles PS, and Graham JM. A comparison of the analgesic efficacy and side-effects of paravertebral vs epidural blockade for thoracotomy-a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Br J Anaesth 2006; 96(4): 418-26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bja/ael020

Joshi GP, Bonnet F, Shah R, Wilkinson RC, Camu F, Fischer B, Neugebauer EAM, Rawal N, Schug SA, Simanski C, and Kehlet H. A systematic review of randomized trials evaluating regional techniques for post thoracotomy analgesia. Anesth Analg 2008; 107(3): 1026-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1213/01.ane.0000333274.63501.ff

Detterbeck FC. Efficacy of methods of intercostal nerve blockade for pain relief after thoracotomy. Ann Thorac Surg 2005; 80(4): 1550-1559. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.11.051

R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria 2014.

Burns DA, Ben-David B, Chelly JE, and Greensmith JE. Intercostally placed paravertebral catheterization: an alternative approach to continuous paravertebral blockade. Anesth Analg 2008; 107(1): 339-41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1213/ane.0b013e318174df1d

Riain SCO, O Donnell B, Cuffe T, Harmon DC, Fraher JP, and Shorten G. Thoracic paravertebral block using real-time ultrasound guidance. Anesth Analg 2010; 110(1): 248-51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181c35906

Renes SH, Bruhn J, Gielen MJ, Scheffer GJ, and van Geffen GJ. In-plane ultrasound-guided thoracic paravertebral block: a preliminary report of 36 cases with radiologic confirmation of catheter position. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2010; 35(2): 212- 6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AAP.0b013e3181c75a8b

Lönnqvist PA, MacKenzie J, Soni AK, and Conacher ID. Paravertebral blockade, failure rate and complications. Anesthesia 1995; 50(9): 813-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.1995.tb06148.x

Naja Z and Lönnqvist PA. Somatic paravertebral nerve blockade. Incidence of failed block and complications. Anesthesia 2001; 56(12): 1184-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2044.2001.02084-2.x

Luyet C, Eichenberger U, Greif R, Vogt A, Farkas ZS, and Moriggl B. Ultrasound-guided paravertebral puncture and placement of catheters in human cadavers: an imaging study. Br J Anaesth 2009; 102(4): 534-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bja/aep015

Luyet C, Meyer C, Herrmann G, Hatch GM, Ross S, and Eichenberger U. Placement of coiled catheters into the paravertebral space. Anesthesia 2012; 67(3): 250-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.2011.06988.x

Raveglia F, Rizzi A, Leporati A, Di Mauro P, Cioffi U and Baisi A. Analgesia in patients undergoing thoracotomy: epidural versus paravertebral technique. A randomized, double-blind, prospective study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2014; 147(1): 469-73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.09.024

Baguley T. Calculating and graphing within-subject confidence intervals for anova. Behav Res Methods 2012; 44(1): 158-75. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13428-011-0123-7

Downloads

Published

2015-06-30

Issue

Section

Articles