Peer Review Policy

All submissions to Green publishers indiscriminately undergo peer-reviewing process prior to the publication. We involve the expert and proficient peer reviewers of the relevant fields from around the world to obtain a timely yet meticulous and constructive evaluation of the submitted work. Initially all submission are assessed by a designated Editorial board member for its appropriateness to the scope of the journal followed by the evaluation by editor’s selected reviewers. A double-blinded review policy is observed at Green publisher to maintain the transparency and integrity of the evaluation process. A minimum of two reviewers’ reports are obtained for each submission. The authors may suggest some reviewers’ names and contacting emails at the time of submission however, their selection for assessing the manuscript will be solely an editor’s choice and at least one further review from external reviewer will also be carried out other than the referees recommended by the authors. In order to maintain confidentiality, no review report is shared by the third parties other than the concerned editors and reviewers. Submissions from the Editor-in-Chief and Editorial Board Members will be initially evaluated by different editors, maintaining the double-blinded policy, to discover acceptance and then peer-reviewed by external reviewers.