Low and Ultra-Low CSE Anesthesia in Elective Cesarean Sections. Prospective Randomized and Experimental Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14205/2310-9394.2015.03.01.3Keywords:
Local anesthesia, low doses, combined spinal-epidural technique, CSE, cesarean section, maternal hypotension, neonatal resuscitation, fetal pH.Abstract
Objective: Regional anesthesia is the preferred technique used in elective cesarean sections. The controversy lies in knowing what dose of local anesthetic allows for the safety of both mother and fetus during the procedure. The combined spinal-epidural technique (CSE) allows the intradural dose to be lowered, ensuring an adequate block through additional epidural doses. Our aim was to study the success of the technique.
Method: We carried out a prospective, randomized study of 102 women scheduled for cesarean section. Our objective was to study the incidence of maternal hypotension, the success of the technique, motor block, and repercussions in parameters of fetal well-being after performing a combined technique (CSE) with low and ultra-low doses of hyperbaric levobupivacaine (LB-5mg versus LB-3.75mg) plus epidural extension with 10ml of isobaric levobupivacaine 0.25%.
Results: We found no difference in the incidence of maternal hypotension between our groups. The overall success of the technique was 81.4% directly relating to the length of the surgical procedure. 18.6% of the patients required some type of analgesic booster in the course of the study. We found no difference in the type of neonatal resuscitation used, but there was a statistically significant difference in umbilical cord arterial pH.
Conclusion: The use of low and ultra-low doses can be an alternative in carefully selected cases. The doses used were sufficient for the cesarean section to be performed in the majority of our study subjects. We did not find evident advantages with regard to the incidence of maternal hypotension and we do not believe that the use of ultra-low doses proves beneficial.
References
Habib AS. Anaesthesia for caesarean delivery of growthrestricted foetuses: a bird in the hand is worth two in the bush. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2013; 30(1): 5-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0b013e328357659b
Rout CC, Rocke DA, Levin J, Gouws E and Reddy D. A reevaluation of the role of crystalloid preload in the prevention of hypotension associated with spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean section. Anesthesiology 1993; 79(2): 262-269. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00000542-199308000-00011
Doherty A, Ohashi Y, Downey K and Carvalho JC. Phenylephrine infusion versus bolus regimens during cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia: a double-blind randomized clinical trial to assess hemodynamic changes. Anesth Analg 2012; 115(6): 1343-1350. http://dx.doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0b013e31826ac3db
Cooper D, Schofield L, Hynd R, Selvan D, Lloyd A, Meek T and Winnard J. Prospective evaluation of systolic arterial pressure control with a phenylephrine infusion regimen during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section. Int J Obstet Anesth 2012; 21(3): 245-252. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijoa.2012.02.009
Van de Velde M, Van Schoubroeck D, Jani J, Teunkens A, Missant C and Deprest J. Combined spinal-epidural anesthesia for cesarean delivery: dose-dependent effects of hyperbaric bupivacaine on maternal hemodynamics. Anesth Analg 2006; 103(1): 187-190, table of contents. http://dx.doi.org/10.1213/01.ane.0000220877.70380.6e
Coppejans HC and Vercauteren MP. Low-dose combined spinal-epidural anesthesia for cesarean delivery: a comparison of three plain local anesthetics. Acta Anaesthesiol Belg 2006; 57(1): 39-43.
Arzola C and Wieczorek PM. Efficacy of low-dose bupivacaine in spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean delivery: systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth 2011; 107(3): 308-318. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bja/aer200
Leo S, Sng BL, Lim Y and Sia AT. A randomized comparison of low doses of hyperbaric bupivacaine in combined spinalepidural anesthesia for cesarean delivery. Anesth Analg 2009; 109(5): 1600-1605. http://dx.doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181b72d35
Teoh WH and Sia AT. Ultra-low dose combined spinalepidural anaesthesia for Caesarean section in severe preeclampsia. Anaesthesia 2006; 61(5): 511-512. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.2006.04630.x
Lew E, Yeo SW and Thomas E. Combined spinal-epidural anesthesia using epidural volume extension leads to faster motor recovery after elective cesarean delivery: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study. Anesth Analg 2004; 98(3): 810-814, table of contents. http://dx.doi.org/10.1213/01.ANE.0000101987.79454.BC
Koertzen M and Plaat F. Ultra-light combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia. Int J Obstet Anesth 2009; 18(2): 194-195. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijoa.2008.12.005
Roofthooft E and Van de Velde M. Low-dose spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean section to prevent spinal-induced hypotension. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2008; 21(3): 259-262. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ACO.0b013e3282ff5e41
Guasch E, Dominguez A, Alsina E and Gilsanz F. Combined spinal-epidural anesthesia with very low dose hyperbaric levobupivacaine for cesarean section in a preeclamptic patient. Int J Obstet Anesth 2007; 16(1): 91-93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijoa.2006.08.003
Qiu MT, Lin FQ, Fu SK, Zhang HB, Li HH, Zhang LM and Li Q. Combination of low-dose bupivacaine and opioids provides satisfactory analgesia with less intraoperative hypotension for spinal anesthesia in cesarean section. CNS Neurosci Ther 2012; 18(5): 426-432. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-5949.2012.00306.x
Serenius F, Winbo I, Dahlquist G and Kallen B. Regional differences in stillbirth and neonatal death rate in Sweden with a cause-of-death specific analysis. Acta Paediatr 2001; 90(9): 1062-1067. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1651-2227.2001.tb01364.x
Soltanifar S and Russell R. The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidelines for caesarean section, 2011 update: implications for the anaesthetist. Int J Obstet Anesth 2012; 21(3): 264-272. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijoa.2012.03.004
Kucukguclu S, Unlugenc H, Gunenc F, Kuvaki B, Gokmen N, Gunasti S, Guclu S, Yilmaz F and Isik G. The influence of epidural volume extension on spinal block with hyperbaric or plain bupivacaine for Caesarean delivery. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2008; 25(4): 307-313. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0265021507002670
Reynolds F and Seed PT. Anaesthesia for Caesarean section and neonatal acid-base status: a meta-analysis. Anaesthesia 2005; 60(7): 636-653. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.2005.04223.x
Heesen M, Kolhr S, Rossaint R and Straube S. Prophylactic phenylephrine for caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia: systematic review and meta-analysis. Anaesthesia 2014; 69(2): 143-165. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/anae.12445
