Abdominal Perimeter Reduction with a Non-Contact Transdermal Radiofrequency Device at 27.12 Mhz and 300 Atts of Power: Retrospective Results Study


  • Fabian Perez Rivera Plastic surgeon, Buenos Aires, Argentina




Radiofrequency, Body Contouring, Abdominal Reduction, Non-Invasive Fat Reduction, Non-Contact Transdermal Radiofrequency.


Introduction: The global demand for non-invasive fat reduction procedures is continuously increasing. Numerous procedures have been developed for this purpose, such as ultrasound, focused ultrasound, cryolipolysis, radiofrequency, and laser, which can be used alone or combined. Several of these procedures do not have publications with evident results, and others, although they obtain results, have described adverse effects and moderate and severe complications. Methods: Retrospective patient records evaluation. Forty patients, twenty-three women and seventeen men, treated between August 2017 and December 2019, fulfilled a control at 30 days post-treatment (PT), with ages between 19 and 84 years, an average of 50 years, who underwent complete treatment of 6 and 8 sessions with non-contact transdermal radiofrequency equipment (NCTR) of 27.12 Mhz and 300 watts of power. Results: The patient's abdominal perimeter average reduction obtained was 1.35 cm (range of 0 cm to 6 cm) on patients who performed six sessions. The patient's abdominal perimeter average reduction was 2.47 cm (range 0.5 cm to 13 cm) on patients who completed eight sessions. The abdominal perimeter average reduction in all 40 patients was 1.91 cm (range 0 cm to 13 cm). Only two patients of the group of six sessions didn't show any reduction. A significant abdominal perimeter reduction measure decreased according to the increase of sessions number: 54.65 % more reduction comparing the eight sessions group against the six sessions group of treated patients. More abdominal circunference reduction was found in males, an average of 2.7 cm, compared to females, an average of 1.5 cm, in the total of 40 patients comparing at 30 days post-treatment control results. It means that males obtain 55% more response to the treatment than females. Four fatty tissue induration that did not generate deformity or symptomatology appear as side effects. Resolved spontaneously without treatment in 7 days in the whole series appear. Conclusion: NCTR device at 27.12 Mhz and 300 watts of power turned out to be a safe and effective treatment to eliminate abdominal and flank fat, reduce circumference, and improve abdominal contour in most patients treated. A significant increase in abdominal perimeter reduction was found according to the rise in NCTR sessions. This significant reduction is noticed better at 30-day PT control than at the end of the treatment. Males obtain a better response to the treatment. Carrying out prospective studies with a larger number of subjects and long-term follow-up and adding better fat tissue reduction controls like ultrasound, computed axial tomography in all patients will make it possible to objectify better the results obtained.


Zeena AD, y col: Fat reduction. Complications and management. Journal American Academy of Dermatology. 2018. 79 (2): 197–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2017.07.026

Sozer SO y col: Abdominoplasty with cincunferential liposuction: a review of 1000 consecutive cases. Plas Reconst Surgery. 2018. 142 (4): 891-901. https://doi.org/10.1097/prs.0000000000004819

Chia CT y col: Evidence-based medicine: liposuction. Plas Reconst Surg. 2017. 139 (1): 267e-274e. https://doi.org/10.1097/prs.0000000000002859

Decorato JW, Chen B, Sierra R: Subcutaneous adipose tissue response to a non-invasive hyperthermic treatment using a 1,060nm laser. Lasers Surg Med 2017; 49 (5):480–489. https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.22625

Lee HJ, Lee MH, Lee SG, Yeo UC, Chang SE: Evaluation of a novel device, high-intensity focused ultrasound with a contact cooling for subcutaneous fat reduction. Lasers Surg Med 2016; 48 (9):878–886. https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.22576

Kennedy J, Verne S, Griffith R, Falto-Aizpurua L, Nouri K: Non-invasive subcutaneous fat reduction: a review. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2015; 29 (9):1679–1688. https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.12994

Alizadeh Z, Halabchi F, Mazaheri R, Abolhasani M, Tabesh M: Review of the mechanisms and effects of non-invasive body contouring devices on cellulite and subcutaneous fat. Int J Endocrinol Metab 2016; 14 (4):e36727. https://doi.org/10.5812/ijem.36727

Weiss R, Weiss M, Beasley K, Vrba J, Bernardy J: Operator independent focused high frequency ISM band for fat reduction: porcine model. Lasers Surg Med 2013; 45(4):235–239. https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.22134

Moradi A, Palm M: Selective non-contact field radiofrequency extended treatment protocol: evaluation of safety and efficacy. J Drugs Dermatol 2015; 14 (9):982–985.

Fajkosova K, Machovcova A, Onder M, Fritz K: Selective radiofrequency therapy as a noninvasive approach for contactless body contouring and circumferential reduction. J Drugs Dermatol 2014; 13 (3):291–296.

Kim H: The combination of extracorporeal shock wave therapy and non-contact apoptosisinducing radiofrequency achieved significant waist circumferential reduction: a pilot study. Laser Ther 2017; 26 (2):129–136. https://doi.org/10.5978/islsm.17-or-11

Kwon TR, Kim JH, Joon S, Mun SK, Kim CW, Kim BJ: Assessment of equivalence of adipose tissue treatment with a non-contact field RF system delivering 200W for 30 min and 300W for 20 min: An in vivo porcine study. Laser Ther 2017; 26 (1):39–52. https://doi.org/10.5978/islsm.17-or-5

Goo B, Kim DS: Impact of contactless apoptosis-inducing RF on temperature of human skin surface and subcutaneous layer as well as porcine histology: a pilot study. Med Laser 2016; 5 (1):29–33. https://doi.org/10.25289/ml.2016.5.1.29

Choi SY y col: Improvement in abdominal and flank contouring by a novel adipocyte-selective non-contact radiofrequency device. Lasers Surg Med. 2018; 50 (7), 738-744. https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.22808

Pantelides NM, Murphy R, Rimouche S: Fullthickness skin necrosis following cryolipolysis to the upper arm. Eur J Plast Surg. Online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-018-1422-3

Lee SJ y col. A case of motor neuropathy after cryolipolysis of the arm. J Cosmetic Laser Therapy 2016; 18 (7): 403-404.

Garibyan L, y col: Transient alterations of cutaneous sensory nerve function by noninvasive cryolipolysis. J Investigative Dermatology 2015; 135, 2623-2631. https://doi.org/10.1038/jid.2015.233

Kelly ME y col: Treatment of paradoxical adipose hyperplasia following cryolipolysis: a single-center experience. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2018; 142 (1): 89-92. https://doi.org/10.1097/prs.0000000000004523

Mathew MA, MD, Rosemary SH. Cryolipolysis for subcutaneous fat layer reduction. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine 41:703–708 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.20864