Reliability and Validity of the Hungarian Version of the Maternal Antenatal Attachment Scale
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14205/2309-4400.2014.02.01.5Keywords:
Maternal Antenatal Attachment Scale (MAAS), reliability, validity, maternal anxiety and depression, dyadic adjustment, mother-foetus attachment.Abstract
Objectives: In this study, the psychometric properties of the Hungarian version of the Maternal Antenatal Attachment Scale (MAAS) were examined. Our primary aim was to investigate the validity and reliability of the MAAS. Additionally, we analyzed prenatal attachment in regard to socio-demographic determinants, characteristics of actual pregnancy, as well as the mothers' mental health during pregnancy and partnership adjustment. Background: Condon's MAAS has been one of the most frequently used instruments to assess prenatal attachment since 1993. Analyzing its psychometric properties is important regarding clinical practice, research of the topic and also the comparability of international research results. Methods: This study involved 253 women within different stages of pregnancy. Responses were assessed using the MAAS, the Prenatal Attachment Inventory (PAI), the Dyadic Adjustment Scale (DAS), and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Results: The Hungarian version of the MAAS has stable psychometric properties, high internal consistency and good internal and external reliability regarding the MAAS Total score, as well as its two subscales, the Quality of maternal prenatal attachment and the Intensity of preoccupation. Our results confirm that the development of mother-foetus attachment shows a positive association with the plannedness and wantedness of pregnancy, the number of gestational weeks and the level of partnership adjustment too. Furthermore, negative correlation was found with maternal depression and anxiety level during pregnancy. Conclusion: According to our results, the Hungarian version of the MAAS is a reliable and valid measure of maternal prenatal attachment from an early stage of pregnancy.
References
Benedek T. Parenthood as a developmental phase – A contribution to the libido theory. J Am Psychoanal Assoc 1959; 7:389-417. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/000306515900700301
Bibring GL. Some considerations of the psychological processes in pregnancy. Psychoanal Study Child 1959; 14:113-121.
Bibring GL, Dwyer TF, Huntington DS, Valenstein AF. A study of the psychological processes in pregnancy and of the earliest mother – Child relationship – I. Some propositions and comments. Psychoanal Study Child 1961; 16: 9-24.
Deutsch H. The Psychology of Women. Vols. 1, 2. New York: Grune and Stratton; 1944/45.
Bowlby J. Attachment and loss. Vol 1. Attachment. New York: Basic Books; 1969.
Condon JT. The assessment of antenatal emotional attachment: development of a questionnaire instrument. Br J Med Psychol 1993; 66: 167-183. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8341.1993.tb01739.x
Laxton-Kane M, Slade P. The role of maternal prenatal attachment in a woman’s experience of pregnancy and implications for the process of care. J Reprod Infant Psychol 2002; 20: 253-266. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0264683021000033174
Cranley MS. Development of a tool for the measurement of maternal attachment during pregnancy. Nurs Res 1981; 30: 281–284. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00006199-198109000-00008
Muller ME. Prenatal and postnatal attachment: a modest correlation. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs1996; 25: 161– 166. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1552-6909.1996.tb02420.x
Canella BL. Maternal-fetal attachment: An integrative review. J Adv Nurs 2005; 50: 60-68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2004.03349.x
Fonagy P, Steele H, Steele M. Maternal representations of attachment during pregnancy predict the organization of infant-mother attachment at one year of age. Child Dev 1991; 62: 891-905. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1131141
Siddiqui A, Hägglöf B, Eisemann M. Own memories of upbringing as a determinant of prenatal attachment in expectant women. J Reprod Infant Psychol 2000; 18: 67-74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02646830050001690
Mikulincer M, Florian V. Maternal-fetal bonding, coping strategies, and mental health during pregnancy: The contribution of attachment style. Infant Ment Health J 1999; 18: 255-276.
Condon JT, Corkindale C. The correlates of antenatal attachment in pregnant women. Br J Med Psychol 1997; 70: 359-372. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8341.1997.tb01912.x
Saisto T, Salmela-Aro K, Nurmi JE, Halmesmäki E. Psychological predictors of disappointment with delivery and puerperal depression. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2001; 80: 39-45.
Collins NL, Dunkel-Schetter C, Lobel M, Scrimshaw SCM. Social support in pregnancy: Psychosocial correlates of birth outcomes and postpartum depression. J Pers Soc Psychol 1993; 65: 1243-1258. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.65.6.1243
Martins C, Gaffan EA. Effect of early maternal depression on patterns of infant-mother attachment: A meta-analytic investigation. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2000; 41: 737-746. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1469-7610.00661
Righetti-Veltema M, Conne-Perréard E, Bonsquet A, Manzano J. Postpartum depression and mother-infant relationship at 3 months old. J Affect Disord 2002; 70: 291- 306. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0327(01)00367-6
Field T, Diego M, Hernandez-Reif M, Schanberg S, Kuhn C, Yando R, Bendell D. Pregnancy anxiety and comorbid depression and anger: Effects on the fetus and neonate. Depress Anxiety 2003; 17: 140-151. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/da.10071
Dunkel-Schetter C (1998). Maternal stress and preterm delivery. Prenat Neonat Med 1998; 3: 39-42.
Rini CK, Dunkel-Schetter C, Wadhwa PD, Sandman CA. Psychological adaptation and birth outcomes: The role of personal resources, stress, and sociocultural context in pregnancy. Health Psychol 1999; 18: 333-345. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.18.4.333
Glynn LM, Dunkel Schetter C, Hobel CJ, Sandman CA. Pattern of perceived stress and anxiety in pregnancy predicts preterm birth. Health Psychol 2008; 27: 43-51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.27.1.43
Teixeira JMA, Fisk NM, Glover V. Association between maternal anxiety in pregnancy and increased uterine artery resistance index: Cohort based study. BMJ, 1999; 318:153- 157. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.318.7177.153
Field T, Sandberg D, Quetel TA, Garcia R, Rosario M. Effect of ultrasound feedback on pregnancy anxiety, fetal activity, and neonatal outcome. Obstet Gynecol 1985; 66: 525-528.
Huizink AC, Robles de Medina PG, Mulder EJH, Visser GHA, Buitelaar JK. Stress during pregnancy is associated with developmental outcome in infancy. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2003; 44: 810-818. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1469-7610.00166
Brisch KH, Munz D, Bemmerer-Mayer K, Terinde R, Kreienberg R, Kächele H. Coping styles of pregnant women after prenatal ultrasound screening for fetal malformation. J Psychosom Res 2003; 55: 91-97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3999(02)00572-X
Sz. Mako H, Deak A. Partner satisfaction, maternal attachment quality and depression in pregnancy. Poster session presented at the 19th World Family Therapy Congress, Noordwijkerhout, The Netherlands, 2011.
White MA, Wilson ME, Elander G, Persson B. The Swedish family: transition to parenthood. Scand J Caring Sci 1999; 13: 171-176. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6712.1999.tb00536.x
Wilson ME, White MA, Cobb B, Curry R, Greene D, Popovich D. Family dynamics, parental-fetal attachment and infant temperament. J Adv Nurs 2000; 31: 204-210. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.01245.x
Kroelinger CD, Oths KS. Partner support and pregnancy wantedness. Birth 2000; 27: 112-119. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-536x.2000.00112.x
Siddiqui A, Hägglöf B. Does maternal prenatal attachment predict postnatal mother-infant interaction? Early Hum Dev 2000; 59: 13-25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3782(00)00076-1
van Bussel JCH, Spitz B, Demyttenaere K. Reliability and validity of the Dutch version of the maternal antenatal attachment scale. Arch Womens Ment Health 2010; 13: 267- 277. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00737-009-0127-9
Muller ME, Ferketich S. Factor analysis of the Maternal Fetal Attachment Scale. Nurs Res 1993; 42: 144-147.
Gau ML, Lee TY. Construct validity of the prenatal attachment inventory: A confirmatory factor analysis approach. J Nurs Res 2003; 11: 177-187. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.JNR.0000347634.18218.2f
Siddiqui A, Hägglöf B. An exploration of prenatal attachment in Swedish expectant women. J Reprod Infant Psychol 1999; 17: 369-380. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02646839908404602
Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1983; 67: 361-370. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x
Crawford JR, Henry JD, Crombie C, Taylor EP. Normative data for the HADS from a large non-clinical sample. Br J Clin Psychol 2001; 40: 429-434. http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/014466501163904
Muszbek K, Székely A, Balogh ÉM, Molnár M, Rohánszky M, Ruzsa Á, Varga K, Szöllsi M, Vadász P. Validation of the Hungarian translation of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Qual Life Res 2006; 15: 761-766. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-005-3627-8
Spanier GB. Measuring dyadic adjustment: New scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. Journal of Marriage and the Family 1976; 38: 15-28. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/350547
Jakobovits Á. (2010). A magzat fiziológiás testmozgása a méhben (Physiology of intrauterine fetal activity). Orvosi Hetilap 2010; 151: 205-212. http://dx.doi.org/10.1556/OH.2010.28593
Hjelmstedt A, Widström AM, Collins A. Psychological correlates of prenatal attachment in women who conceived after in vitro fertilization and women who conceived naturally. Birth 2006; 33: 303-310. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-536X.2006.00123.x
Berryman JC, Windridge KC. Pregnancy after 35 and attachment to the fetus. J Reprod Infant Psychol 1996; 14: 133-143. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02646839608404510
Heidrich SM, Cranley MS. Effect of fetal movement, ultrasound scans, and amniocentesis on maternal-fetal attachment. Nurs Res 1989; 38: 81-84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00006199-198903000-00008
Condon JT, Esuvaranathan V. The influence of parity on the experience of pregnancy: A comparison of first- and secondtime expectant couples. Br J Med Psychol 1990; 63: 369-377. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8341.1990.tb01632.x
Nichols MR, Roux GM, Harris NR. Primigravid and multigravid women: Prenatal perspectives. J Perinat Educ 2007;16: 21-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1624/105812407X192019
Bloom KC. The development of attachment behaviors in pregnant adolescents. Nurs Res 1995; 44: 284-289. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00006199-199509000-00005
Righetti PL, Dell’Avanzo M, Grigio M, Nicolini U. Maternal/paternal antenatal attachment and fourthdimensional ultrasound technique: A preliminary report. Br J Psychol 2005; 96: 129-137. http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/000712604X15518
Zachariah R. Maternal–fetal attachment: Influence of mother– daughter and husband-wife relationships. Res Nurs Health 1994; 17: 37-44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nur.4770170106
Lindgren K. Relationships among maternal–fetal attachment, prenatal depression and health practices in pregnancy. Res Nurs Health 2001; 24: 203–217. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nur.1023
Bloom KC. Perceived relationship with the father of the baby and maternal attachment in adolescents. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 1998; 27: 420-430. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1552-6909.1998.tb02666.x
Wayland J, Tate S. Maternal-fetal attachment and perceived relationships with important others in adolescents. Birth 1993; 20: 198-203. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-536X.1993.tb00227.x
