Social Disapproval and Reasons Behind Tobacco Use as Perceived by Pregnant Women

Authors

  • Amel Fayed King Saud Ben Abdel Aziz University for Health Sciences. College of Sciences and Health Professionals Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
  • Ahmed Mandil Department of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
  • Rasmieh A. Alzeidan Sheikh Bahmdan Chair of Evidence-Based Healthcare and Knowledge Translation, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
  • Samia Ahmad Sheikh Bahmdan Chair of Evidence-Based Healthcare and Knowledge Translation, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
  • Ghadeer Al-Shaikh Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
  • Haifa Wahabi Sheikh Bahmdan Chair of Evidence-Based Healthcare and Knowledge Translation, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14205/2309-4400.2013.01.02.4

Keywords:

Social disapproval, social unacceptability, tobacco use, smoking, pregnant women, Saudi Arabia.

Abstract

Background: Societal perception of smokers, and reasons behind them smoking both reflect acceptance or rejection of smoking behaviour and can reframe tobacco prevention and/or cessation programs to be more effective in tobacco control. This study aimed at targeting the social unacceptability of smoking amongst Saudi females and considering their opinions of the reasons behind smoking amongst both genders.

Methodology: We followed a cross-sectional approach towards data collection from a sample of pregnant women seen at the antenatal clinic at King Khalid University hospital, irrespective of their gestational age. The data was collected using a pretested, anonymous, self administered questionnaire.

Results: 1208 pregnant women were included in our study. Their mean age was 29 + 6 years, and their mean gestational age was 29.6 + 7 weeks. Most women (88%) either agreed or strongly agreed that exposure to smoking may harm the foetus, and only 3.5% of them would accept to smoke if they were offered a cigarette by their husbands. The top reported reasons for smoking amongst males and females were: association with tobacco using friend, reduction of stress, and manifestation of masculinity or gender equality. Pregnant women were not impressed by smokers, and as less than 1% of them considered them attractive and about 25% of them believed male and female smokers feel insecure.

Conclusion: The social disapproval of smoking behaviour in this study was prominent especially towards female smokers. Reasons behind smoking are still blamed on friends, family members and peer pressure. Such results are important in shaping tobacco prevention and control programs

References

Shafey O. Health issues in the Arab American community. Global epidemiology and health hazards of tobacco use: Arab world patterns. Ethn Dis 2007; 17: S3.

WHO: Global status report - World Health Organization www.who.int/nmh/publications/ncd_report_full_en.pdf. Date of access April 2013 2013.

McCool J, Hoek J, Edwards R, Thomson G, Gifford H. Crossing the smoking divide for young adults: expressions of stigma and identity among smokers and nonsmokers. Nicotine Tob Res 2013; 15: 552-56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ntr/nts136

Charlton A. Children's opinions about smoking. J R Coll Gen Pract 1984; 34: 483-87.

Leonardi-Bee J, Smyth A, Britton J, Coleman T. Environmental tobacco smoke and fetal health: systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2008; 93: F351-F361. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/adc.2007.133553

Leonardi-Bee J, Britton J, Venn A. Secondhand smoke and adverse fetal outcomes in nonsmoking pregnant women: a meta-analysis. Pediatrics 2011; 127: 734-41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1542/peds.2010-3041

Salmasi G, Grady R, Jones J, McDonald SD. Environmental tobacco smoke exposure and perinatal outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analyses. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2010; 89: 423-41. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/00016340903505748

Alamar B, Glantz SA. Effect of increased social unacceptability of cigarette smoking on reduction in cigarette consumption. Am J Public Health 2006; 96: 1359-63. http://dx.doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2005.069617

Brown A, Moodie C, Hastings G. A longitudinal study of policy effect (smoke-free legislation) on smoking norms: ITC Scotland/United Kingdom. Nicotine Tob Res 2009; 11: 924- 32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntp087

Hammond D, Fong GT, Zanna MP, Thrasher JF, Borland R. Tobacco denormalization and industry beliefs among smokers from four countries. Am J Prev Med 2006; 31: 225- 32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2006.04.004

Nagelhout GE, Mons U, Allwright S, Guignard R, Beck F, Fong GT, et al. Prevalence and predictors of smoking in "smoke-free" bars. Findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Europe Surveys. Soc Sci Med 2011; 72: 1643- 51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.03.018

CDC: CDC http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/ mm6143a4.htm. Date of access April 2013 2013.

Milton B, Cook PA, Dugdill L, Porcellato L, Springett J, Woods SE. Why do primary school children smoke? A longitudinal analysis of predictors of smoking uptake during pre-adolescence. Public Health 2004; 118: 247-55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2003.10.006

Pathania VS. Women and the smoking epidemic: turning the tide. Bull World Health Organ 2011; 89: 162. http://dx.doi.org/10.2471/BLT.11.086389

Brandt AM. Blow some my way: passive smoking, risk and American culture. Clio Med 1998; 46: 164-87.

Piko BF, Bak J, Gibbons FX. Prototype perception and smoking: are negative or positive social images more important in adolescence? Addict Behav 2007; 32: 1728-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2006.12.003

Downloads

Published

2013-12-31

Issue

Section

Articles