Therapeutic Management of Vaginal Intraepithelial Neoplasia and Clinical Experience in South Western Sydney of Australia

Authors

  • Chi Eung Danforn Lim Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Australia
  • Wu Shun Felix Wong Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Australia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14205/2309-4400.2013.01.01.6

Keywords:

Vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia, Human Papilloma Virus, Australia.

Abstract

Background: VAIN is consistently associated with prior or concurrent neoplasia elsewhere in the lower genital tract. Studies have shown 50-90% of patients with VAIN had or currently have either intraepithelial neoplasia or carcinoma of the cervix or vulva. VAIN represents 1% of all intraepithelial neoplasia and vaginal cancers account for 1-3% of all gynecological malignancies.

Aim: This article is aimed to give an overview of the current therapeutic management options of VAIN. In addition, all available clinical cases of VAIN among South Western Sydney area's hospitals were pooled to compare its treatment with the current therapeutic options as identified from the literature review.

Method: A literature search was conducted using the Medline and Pubmed databases. All available clinical cases of VAIN among South Western Sydney area's hospitals were pooled from the clinical databases within the network hospitals

Results: Between July 1999 to February 2009, 61 patients aged 18 to 88 years (median = 42, average =44.3) were diagnosed with VAIN I to III at the Sydney South West Area Health Services (SSWAHS) in Sydney, Australia. Of these 10 patients, forty percent had a previous hysterectomy for cervical neoplasia. This is in keeping with the current literature regarding VAIN aetiology.

Conclusion: Due to the rarity of this disease, many authors have identified the available literature on the natural history, aetiology and management of VAIN to be limited. Most of the studies on the management of VAIN were single-centre retrospective studies carried out on relatively small groups of patients. Further, the results of the success rates of the different management options vary greatly between each treatment centre. In order for our patients at SWSAHS may be managed optimally, higher levels of evidence are required in the future for standard recommendations on the management of VAIN.

References

Matsuo K, Chi D, Walker L, Rosenhein N, Im D. Ultrasonic surgical aspiration for vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2008; 105: 71-73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2008.11.040

Holschneider CH, Berek JS. Vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia. Retrieved on May, 25 2009 from http://www.uptodate.com (2009).

Creasman WT. Vaginal cancers. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2005; 17: 71-76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00001703-200502000-00013

Murta E, Neves M, Sempionato L, Costa M, Maluf P. Vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia: clinical-therapeutic analysis of 33 cases. Archiv Gynecol Obstet 2005; 272: 261-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-005-0022-1

Duarte-Franco E, Franco EL. Other Gynaecologic cancers: endometrial, ovarian, vulvar and vaginal cancers. BMC Women’s Health 2004; 4(Suppl 1): S14.

Schockaert S, Poppe W, Arbyn M, et al. Incidence of vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia after hysterectomy for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a retrospective study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008; 199: 113.e1-113.e5.

Frega A, French D, Piazze J, Cerekja A, Vetrano G, Moscarini M. Prediction of persistent vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia in previously hysterectomised women by high-risk HPV DNA detection. Cancer Lett 2006; 249(2007): 235-41.

Graham K, Wright K, Cadwallader B, Reed N, Symonds P. 20 year retrospective review of medium dose rate intracavitary brachytherapy in VAIN 3. Gynecol Oncol 2007; 106(2007): 105-11.

Daling J, Madeleine M, Schwartz S, Shera K, Carter J, McKnight B, et al. A Population-based study of squamous cell vaginal cancer: HPV and co-factors. Gynecol Oncol 2002; 84(2): 263-70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/gyno.2001.6502

Sugase M, Matsukara T. Distinct manifestations of human papillomaviruses in the vagina. Int J Cancer 1997; 72(3): 412-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097- 0215(19970729)72:33.0.CO;2-S

Sherman J, Mount S, Evans M, Skelly J, Simmons-Arnold L, Eltabbakh G. Smoking increases the risk of high-grade vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia in women with oncogenic human papilloma virus. Gynecol Oncol 2008; 110(3): 396- 401. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.05.015

Indermaur M, Martino M, Fiorica J, Roberts W, Hoffman M. Upper vaginectomy for the treatment of vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005: 193: 577-81.

Massad LS. Outcomes after diagnosis of Vaginal Intraepithelial Neoplasia. J Lower Genital Tract Disease 2007; 12(1): 16-19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/LGT.0b013e318074f968

Guven S, Guvendag ES, Ayhan A, Gokoz A. Recurrence of high-grade squamous intraepithelial neoplasia in neovagina: case report and review of the literature. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2004; 2005(15): 1179-82.

Dodge J, Eltabbakh G, Mount S, Walker P, Morgan A. Clinical features and risk of recurrence among Patients with Vaginal Intraepithelial Neoplasia. Gynecol Oncol 2001; 83: 363-69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/gyno.2001.6401

National Health and Medical Research Centre Screening to Prevent Cervical Cancer: Guidelines for the Management of Asymptomatic Women with Screen Detected Abnormalities. (2006) Retrieved on 25th Jan, 2011 from http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/publications/synopses/wh39syn.ht m

Fetters MD, Lieberman RW, Abrahamse PH, Sanghvi RV, Sonnad SS. Cost-effectiveness of pap smear screening for vaginal cancer after total hysterectomy for benign disease. J Lower Genital Tract Disease 2003; 7(3): 194-202. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00128360-200307000-00007

Downloads

Published

2013-06-30

Issue

Section

Articles