Crises Communication vs. United Nation Sustainable Development Goals: The 7S Paradigm as Feasible Solution Facilitator

Authors

  • Stéphanie Looser University of Surrey, Centre for Environment and Sustainability, Guildford, UK
  • Seraina Mohr University of Lucerne, Institute of Communication and Marketing, Zentralstrasse 12, CH-6002 Lucerne, Switzerland
  • Walter Wehrmeyer University of Surrey, Centre for Environment and Sustainability, Guildford, UK

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31907/2617-121X.2019.03.03.3

Keywords:

Crises Communication & Management, Governance Deficits, Stakeholder Analysis, Network Analysis, Framework.

Abstract

This research's overarching topic is the analysis of present and future crises and/or challenges traced back to the gap between the United Nation (UN) Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and sectors, which are predicted to growth in contradictory unsustainable ways. Its aim is the development of common, globally applicable guidelines based on seven stakeholder analyses tools. These tools are condensed to the so-called "7S(-stakeholder) Paradigm" - referring to Public Stakeholder Analysis (i.e., Policy Field Analysis and Crises Communication/Management), Stakeholder Identification, Stakeholder Prioritisation, Stakeholder Interest Analysis, Stakeholder Response Strategies, Stakeholder Performance Gaps, and Stakeholder Communication Strategies. Private, public as well as the third sector, related environmental, political, socio-economic, and educational challenges might manifest by their clash with the UN SDGs and the public sector's implementation responsibility. The result are example guidelines (i.e., 7S Paradigm) that might act as "decision-trees" - adaptable to different conflictual situations. Thus, potential initial points, appropriate stakeholder communication strategies, etc., might be an advantage. In addition, the herein presented paradigm might be suitable to cover, accompany, and underpin important points, which raise as soon as the public sector must become decisive. The World Economic Forum 2019's hottest-discussed issues (regarding crises related to e.g., politics, polity, policies) were a clear-cut proof of the claim.

References

UN United Nations, UN. Transforming our World: THE 2030 AGENDA FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT. [cited 2019 October 05]: Available from: https://sustainabledevelopment. un.org/content/documents/21252030%20Agenda%20for%20 Sustainable%20Development%20web.pdfUN.org

Brinson SL, Benoit WL. The tarnished star: Restoring Texaco’s damaged public image. Management Quarterly 1999; 12: 483-510. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318999124001

Hearit KM. “Mistakes were made”: Organizations, apologia, and crisis of social legitimacy. Communication Studies 1995; 46: 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510979509368435

Schwarz A. Important trends/topics in future crisis communication research. ECREA – Business Meeting TWG on Crisis Communication 2015: 9. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118516812.ch33

Seymore M, Moore S. Effective crisis Management. London: Continuum 2000.

Pop-Flanja D. Crisis Communication. A case study on the “Collective Blaze”. Studia UBB European 2019; 1: 114-31. https://doi.org/10.24193/subbeuropaea.2019.1.07

Coombs TW. The perspective powers of crisis response strategies: Managing reputational assets during a crisis. Journal of Promotion Management; 12: 241-45. https://doi.org/10.1300/J057v12n03_13

Lagadec P. Un nouveau champ de responsabilité pour les dirigeants. Revue Française de Gestion 1996; 108: 100-9.

Lalonde C. Crisis management and organizational development: Towards the conception of a learning model in crisis management. Organizational Development Journal 2007; 25: 17-26.

Benoit WL. Accounts, excuses and apologies: A theory of image restoration strategies. New York: New York State University Press 2015; 1: 22-31

Gundel S. Towards a new typology of crises. J of Contingencies and Crisis Management 2005; 13: 106-15. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5973.2005.00465.x

Nelson M. Crisis communication: The basics. 2018. [cited 2019 December 01]: Available from: https://hbswk.hbs.edu/ archive/leadership-on-9-11morgan-stanley-s-challenge

Sheppard VA, Fennell DA. Progress in tourism public sector policy: Toward an ethic for non-human animals. Tourism Management. 2019; 73:134-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2018.11.017

Lee TH, Jan FH. Can community-based tourism contribute to sustainable development? Evidence from residents’ perceptions of the sustainability. Tourism Management 2019; 70: 368-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2018.09.003

Gillen J., Mostafanezhad M. Geopolitical encounters of tourism: A conceptual approach. Annales of Tourism Research 2019; 75: 70-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2018.12.015

Blum S, Schubert K. Politikfeldanalyse. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften 2009.

Slocum SL, Dimitrov DY, Webb K. The impact of neoliberalism on higher education tourism programs: Meeting the 2030 sustainable development goals with the next generation. Tourism Management Perspectives 2019; 30: 33-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2019.01.004

Zimmermann W. Unternehmer sind Verrückte 2014; 2. Auflage. Wiesbaden: Springer-Gabler. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-4627-0

Freeman RE. Strategic management: a stakeholder approach. Cambridge: University Press 2010. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139192675

Mason C, Simmons J. Embedding Corporate Social Responsibility in Corporate Governance: A Stakeholder System Approach. J of Business Ethics 2013; 119: 77-86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1615-9

Ulrich, P. Integrative Wirtschaftsethik. Grundlagen einer lebensdienlichen Ökonomie. 3. überarbeitete Auflage. Bern: Haupt Verlag 2011.

Rüegg-Stürm J. Das neue St. Galler Management-Modell. 2., durchgesehene Auflage. Bern: Haupt Verlag 2005. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230505162

Mitchell RK, Agle BR, Wood, DJ. Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of Who and What Really Counts 1997. Academy of Management Review; 22: 853-88. https://doi.org/10.2307/259247

Bryson JM. Strategic Planning for Public and Nonprofit Organisations – A Guide to Strengthening and Sustaining Organisational Achievement 2011. Forth Edition. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Kronenwett M, Schönhuth M. VennMaker Anwenderhandbuch 2011. Version 1.2. [Cited 2018 December 30] Available from: http://vennmaker.unitrier.de/dl/ VennMaker_1_2_Anwenderhandbuch.pdf

Wasserman S, Faust K. Social network analysis: methods and applications 1994. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815478

Beach S. Who or what decides how stakeholders are optimally engaged by governance networks delivering public outcomes? International Research Society for Public Management Conference 2009. Doctoral Panel. Copenhagen: Business School Fredricksberg.

Rasche A, Bakker FGA, Moon J. Complete and Partial Organising for Corporate Social Responsibility 2013. Journal of Business Ethics; 115: 651-63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1824-x

Bryant JW. The six dilemmas of collaboration: inter organisational relationships as drama. Wiley: Chichester 2000.

Brauer R, Dymitrow M, Tribe J. The impact of tourism research. Annals of Tourism Research 2019; 77: 64-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2019.05.006

Blewitt J. Education for Responsible Management: Putting Theory into Practice. The International Journal of Management Education 2017; Vol. 15: 395-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2017.03.014

Scott D, Hall M, Gössling S. Global tourism vulnerability to climate change. Annals of Tourism Research 2019; 77: 49- 61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2019.05.007

Yankholmes A. Tourism as an exercise in three-dimensional power: Evidence from Ghana. Tourism Management Perspectives 2018; 25: 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2017.11.001

Tribe J. Creating and curating tourism knowledge. Annals of Tourism Research 2018; 73: 14-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2018.08.004

Shafiee S, Ghatari AR, Hasanzadeh A, Jahanayan S. Developing a model for sustainable smart tourism destinations: A systematic review. Tourism Management Perspectives 2019; 31: 287-300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2019.06.002

Gottleib Duttweiler Institut, GDI. About us

Avenir Suisse

Weybrecht G. From challenge to opportunity – Management education's crucial role in sustainability and the Sustainable Development Goals – An overview and framework. The International Journal of Management Education 2017; 15: 84-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2017.02.008

University of Constance. Informatik and Informationswissenschaften: Graphenzeichnen 2004. [Cited 2019 May 10]: Available from: http://www.inf.unikonstanz.de/algo/lehre/ss04/gd/demo.html[28.10.2018]

Weir, B. (2017). Climate change and tourism – Are we forgetting lessons from the past? Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management 2017; 32: 108-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2017.05.002

Tölkes C. Sustainability communication in tourism – A literature review. Tourism Management Perspectives 2018; 27: 10-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2018.04.002

Carreira F, Aguiar AC, Onca F, Monzini MThe Celsius Game: An experimental activity on management education simulating the complex challenges for the two-degree climate change target. The International Journal of Management Education 2017; 15: 350-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2017.03.012

Khalilzadeh J. Demonstration of exponential random graph models in tourism studies: Is tourism a means of global peace or the bottom line? Annals of Tourism Research 2018; 69: 31-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2017.12.007

Lyócsa Š., Vašaničová P., Litavcová E. Interconnectedness of international tourism demand in Europe: A crossquantilogram network approach. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 2019; 526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2019.04.155

Looser S. Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholar Publisher 2019.

Downloads

Published

2019-12-25

Issue

Section

Articles