Crisis Communication on One Belt and One Road Initiative of China: A Geo-Political Change

Authors

  • Irshad Ahmed Kaleemi Riphah Institute of Media Sciences, RIPHAH International University, Islamabad, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31907/2617-121X.2019.03.01.4

Keywords:

Geo-strategy, Chinese geo-strategic hegemony, competitive Chinese world order, foreign policy, economic pivot, maritime, overland, port projects, infrastructure, connectivity, people to people contact.

Abstract

In the ancient past, much of East Asia and China was connected to different trading regions of the world through Silk Road. It got its name on the main export item of the then China: Silk. Now China has taken the initiative to rebuild the Silk Road through its OBOR initiative. OBOR has two components in the shape of two projects: over land SREB and a 21st century MSR. Later, merging these two projects under one canopy, OBOR has been termed as BRI of China. This study attempts to answer the research question: One Belt One Road Initiative (OBOR) of China as the primer to a new geo-strategic hegemony for building the competitive Chinese world order would stabilize? A content analysis was performed on pivotal media coverage about OBOR. Since the ever first speech of the President of China, Mr. Xi Jinping in 2013, a media debate is there, on this Chinese initiative. OBOR is an effort to increase the regional connectivity to embrace a China oriented future. For them, this brighter future in the shape of an economic move for Chinese domination in the global affairs, while being the centre of global trade network. China would be celebrating its hundredth anniversary in 2049 and this is exactly the target date of completing the OBOR. A keyword analysis yielded through the speeches of Chinese President Mr. Xi Jinping on the global media networks alongwith the messages conveying Chinese aspirations of its coming out as the global economic lynch pin by the new Chinese geo-strategic hegemony under the canopy of connectivity and cooperation is the pivot of these well telecasted speeches.

References

McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public opinion quarterly, 36(2), 176- 187. https://doi.org/10.1086/267990

Littlejohn, S. W., & Foss, K. A. (2009). Encyclopedia of communication theory (Vol. 1). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412959384

Cohen, B. H. (1963). Recall of categorized words lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66(3), 227. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0048846

Matsaganis, M. D., & Payne, J. G. (2005). Agenda setting in a culture of fear: The lasting effects of September 11 on American politics and journalism. American behavioral scientist, 49(3), 379-392. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764205282049

Iyengar, S., & Kinder, D. R. (1987). News that matters: Agenda-setting and priming in a television age. News that Matters: Agenda-Setting and Priming in a Television Age.

Walgrave, S., & Van Aelst, P. (2006). The contingency of the mass media's political agenda setting power: Toward a preliminary theory. Journal of communication, 56(1), 88-109. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00005.x

McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L. (1993). The evolution of agenda-setting research: Twenty-five years in the marketplace of ideas. Journal of communication, 43(2), 58- 67. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01262.x

Roberts, M., & McCombs, M. (1994). Agenda setting and political advertising: Origins of the news agenda. Political communication, 11(3), 249-262. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.1994.9963030

Walgrave, S., Soroka, S., & Nuytemans, M. (2008). The mass media's political agenda-setting power: A longitudinal analysis of media, parliament, and government in Belgium (1993 to 2000). Comparative Political Studies, 41(6), 814- 836. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414006299098

Dearing, J. W., Rogers, E. M., & Fei, X. (1988, May). The agenda-setting process for the issue of AIDS. In annual meeting of the International Communication Association, New Orleans, May.

Scheufele, D. A. (2000). Agenda-setting, priming, and framing revisited: Another look at cognitive effects of political communication. Mass Communication & Society, 3(2-3), 297- 316. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327825MCS0323_07

Tewksbury, D., & Scheufele, D. A. (2007). Special issue on framing, agenda setting, & priming: Agendas for theory and research. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 8-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00337.x

Ferdinand, P. (2016). Westward ho—the China dream and ‘one belt, one road’: Chinese foreign policy under Xi Jinping. International Affairs, 92(4), 941-957. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.12660

Aris S. One Belt, One Road: China’s Vision of "Connectivity". CSS Analyses in Security Policy 2016; 195.

Huang Y. Understanding China's Belt & Road initiative: motivation, framework and assessment. China Economic Review 2016; 40: 314-321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2016.07.007

Mishra R. Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank: An Assessment. India Quarterly: A Journal of International Affairs 2016; 72: 163-176. https://doi.org/10.1177/0974928416643582

Mayer, M., & Dreyer. (2018). Rethinking the Silk Road. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5915-5

Times, F. (2015). FDIMarkets. Online database, accessed January, 15.

NA, N. (2016). The Marshall Plan: fifty years after. Springer.

Shen, S., & Chan, W. (2018). A comparative study of the One Belt One Road Initiative and the Marshall plan. Palgrave Communications, 4(1), 32. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-018-0077-9

Tobin, Liza. "Beijing's Strategy to Build China into a Maritime Great Power." Naval War College Review 71, no. 2 (2018): 17-48.

Yu H. Motivation behind China’s ‘One Belt, One Road ’initiatives and establishment of the Asian infrastructure investment bank. Journal of Contemporary China 2017; 26(105): 353-368. https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2016.1245894

Shen, S., & Chan, W. (2018). A comparative study of the One Belt One Road Initiative and the Marshall plan. Palgrave Communications, 4(1), 32. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-018-0077-9

Huang, Y. Q., Liang, C. H., He, L., Tian, J., Liang, C. S., Chen, X., ... & Liu, Z. Y. (2016). Development and validation of a radiomics nomogram for preoperative prediction of lymph node metastasis in colorectal cancer. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2015.65.9128

Yu, H. (2017). Motivation behind China’s ‘One Belt, One Road’initiatives and establishment of the Asian infrastructure investment bank. Journal of Contemporary China, 26(105), 353-368. https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2016.1245894

Van der Putten FP, Meijnders M. China, Europe and the Maritime Silk Road. Clingendael, Netherlands Institute of International Relations 2015.

World Bank, Success of China’s OBOR Depends on Policy Reforms.html, https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/pressrelease/2019/06/18 /success-of-chinas-belt-

Hurley, J., Morris, S., & Portelance, G. (2019). Examining the debt implications of the Belt and Road Initiative from a policy perspective. Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development, 3(1), 139-175. https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v3i1.1123

Lanjian C, Wei Z. China OBOR in Perspective of High-speed Railway (HSR)—Research on OBOR Economic Expansion Strategy of China. Advances in Economics and Business 2015; 3(8): 303-321. https://doi.org/10.13189/aeb.2015.030803

Johnson CK. President Xi Jinping's" Belt and Road" Initiative: A Practical Assessment of the Chinese Communist Party's Roadmap for China's Global Resurgence. Center for Strategic and International Studies 2016.

Kelly, P. (2017). Defending Classical Geopolitics. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.279

Downloads

Published

2019-09-17

Issue

Section

Articles